Towering Decisions: Leasing Space vs. Building Vertical Assets for WISP
- by ISPadmin
- 2024 / 02 / 13
- Growth
- Market Analysis
Introduction
The decision between leasing space on existing towers and vertical assets versus building or buying new vertical assets is a critical one. This choice can significantly impact the cost, efficiency, and scalability of WISPs. In this blog post, we will examine the advantages and disadvantages of each approach, shedding light on the factors that can help WISPs make informed decisions.
Leasing Space on Existing Towers:
Advantages:
- Cost Savings: Leasing space on existing towers allows WISPs to sidestep the high upfront costs associated with building new vertical assets. This cost-effective approach enables WISPs to allocate resources to other critical areas such as technology upgrades or customer acquisition.
- Rapid Deployment: With existing towers readily available, WISPs can rapidly deploy their services, reducing the time-to-market. This agility is crucial in staying competitive and capturing market share quickly.
- Reduced Maintenance Burden: Tower maintenance is typically the responsibility of the tower owner. By leasing space, WISPs can transfer the burden of maintenance, repair, and upgrades to the tower owner, freeing up valuable resources and manpower.
Disadvantages:
- Limited Control: WISPs leasing space on existing towers may face limitations in terms of customization and control over the infrastructure. This lack of control could impact the ability to optimize network performance based on specific operational needs.
- Capacity Constraints: Shared tower space may lead to capacity constraints, particularly in densely populated areas with numerous WISPs vying for space. This can result in decreased service quality and slower network speeds.
Building or Buying Vertical Assets:
Advantages:
- Full Control and Customization: Building or buying vertical assets provides WISPs with complete control over the infrastructure. This allows for customization based on specific operational requirements, ensuring optimal network performance.
- Scalability: Owning vertical assets facilitates scalability, as WISPs can expand their infrastructure to accommodate growing demand. This scalability is crucial for long-term success and competitiveness in the WISP industry.
Disadvantages:
- High Initial Investment: Perhaps the most significant drawback is the high upfront investment associated with building or buying vertical assets. This includes costs for land acquisition, construction, permits, and regulatory compliance.
- Maintenance Responsibility: Unlike leasing, WISPs that own vertical assets bear the responsibility for maintenance, repairs, and upgrades. This ongoing commitment requires dedicated resources and expertise, adding to operational complexities.
Conclusion:
Ultimately, the decision between leasing space on existing towers and building or buying vertical assets depends on the unique circumstances and goals of each WISP. While leasing offers cost savings and rapid deployment, owning vertical assets provides control, customization, and scalability. WISPs must carefully weigh these factors to make informed decisions that align with their business objectives and the evolving demands of the WISP industry.
Contact us here to learn more about how ISP Revolution can help you deploy with confidence – the first time
SHARE
MORE INFO
Next-Level Solutions for ISP / WISP
 Welcome to the Revolution
ISP Resolution © 2024 All Rights Reserved