ISP Revolution Logo | Solutions for ISP / WISP
a UBAS initiative

Tarana vs. Ubiquiti: A Comprehensive Guide for WISP Owners

Tarana vs Ubiq

As a WISP (Wireless Internet Service Provider), choosing the right wireless technology can determine your business’s success. Tarana Wireless and Ubiquiti Networks are two of the leading names in the industry, but their products serve different needs. This post breaks down the pros and cons of each, helping you decide which fits your operational and budgetary requirements.

Tarana Wireless

Tarana Wireless has become synonymous with advanced wireless broadband solutions, particularly for providers seeking reliable service in difficult environments

Key Strengths of Tarana:

  1. Exceptional Performance in NLOS and Interference-Prone Areas
    The Tarana G1 platform excels in areas with heavy foliage, urban obstacles, or high wireless interference. Its innovative Smart Antenna Technology and advanced signal processing can provide consistent speeds and low latency, even where other systems struggle.
  2. High Scalability
    Tarana’s multi-user access technology allows WISPs to support a large number of subscribers on a single tower without sacrificing performance. This scalability makes it a great option for growing providers looking to serve densely populated rural towns or suburban areas.
  3. Reduced Maintenance Costs
    Tarana’s adaptive algorithms automatically optimize signal quality and performance, minimizing the need for manual adjustments. This reduces operational costs and the need for on-site technician visits.
  4. Support for High-Bandwidth Applications
    With low latency and high throughput, Tarana’s G1 is ideal for today’s internet demands, including 4K video streaming, remote work, video conferencing, and online gaming.

Limitations of Tarana:

  1. Higher Initial Investment
    Tarana’s cutting-edge technology comes with a steep price tag. Equipment and licensing costs can be challenging for smaller WISPs, making it more suitable for established providers or those with access to funding.
  2. Limited Ecosystem
    Unlike Ubiquiti, which offers a wide array of networking hardware and software, Tarana focuses exclusively on fixed wireless broadband. WISPs looking for an all-in-one solution will need to source complementary equipment from other vendors.

Ubiquiti Networks

Ubiquiti has carved a niche in the WISP market by offering affordable, flexible solutions that are easy to deploy and manage.

Key Strengths of Ubiquiti:

  1. Cost-Effective Solutions
    Ubiquiti’s radios, such as the airMAX and airFiber lines, are among the most affordable options on the market. This makes them a popular choice for startups or WISPs in low-density rural areas.
  2. Wide Range of Products
    Ubiquiti’s portfolio goes beyond wireless radios to include routers, switches, and access points. Their UniFi and UISP platforms allow WISPs to create an integrated network using products from a single vendor.
  3. Easy-to-Use Management Tools
    The UISP software provides intuitive network monitoring, configuration, and customer management tools. Its straightforward interface reduces the learning curve for new WISP operators.
  4. Large Support Community
    Ubiquiti boasts an extensive user community that shares tips, troubleshooting advice, and best practices. This wealth of knowledge can be invaluable for WISPs without dedicated technical teams.

Limitations of Ubiquiti:

  1. Performance in Challenging Environments
    Ubiquiti equipment performs well in line-of-sight (LOS) conditions but struggles in areas with significant interference or non-line-of-sight (NLOS) challenges.
  2. Capacity Constraints
    While suitable for small to medium-sized deployments, Ubiquiti’s radios can hit scalability limits in high-density or high-bandwidth scenarios, potentially requiring more towers and equipment than a Tarana deployment.

Head-to-Head Comparison

Plan for Expansion

Plan for Expansion

Plan for Expansion

Best Use Case

High-interference and NLOS areas

Low-density and LOS environments

Cost

High initial investment

Budget-friendly

Scalability

High

Moderate

Ease of Use

Minimal tuning required

Intuitive management tools

Product Ecosystem

Limited (focused on fixed wireless)

Broad (radios, routers, switches)

Latency and Speed

Low latency, high throughput

Adequate for basic broadband needs

Interference Handling

Exceptional

Moderate

Which Should You Choose?

  • Choose Tarana if:
    • You need to cover areas with high wireless interference or NLOS conditions (e.g., wooded, hilly, or urban settings).
    • Your business plan emphasizes scalability and long-term subscriber growth.
    • You have the budget for premium equipment or are applying for funding (e.g., BEAD or RDOF grants).
  • Choose Ubiquiti if:
    • You’re operating in low-density, line-of-sight areas with minimal interference.
    • You want an affordable, easy-to-manage solution for starting or expanding a WISP.
    • You value a vendor that provides a broad ecosystem for networking needs.

How to Decide?

Selecting between Tarana and Ubiquiti isn’t an either/or decision—it’s about matching the right tool to your unique deployment needs. Some WISPs even use both, deploying Tarana in challenging areas and Ubiquiti for low-cost, straightforward expansions.

For expert advice on equipment selection, deployment strategies, and grant funding opportunities, consult ISP Revolution. Our team specializes in helping WISPs scale operations and maximize ROI.

Contact us here to learn more about how ISP Revolution can help you deploy with confidence – the first time

ISP Resolution © 2024 All Rights Reserved